im slowly developing my second sight any tips? i can see auras on things a really concitrate on

I keep seeing basically 2 images, of one thing. In one eye, it's not an aura it's just a fuzzy eye, and it's annoying.

people usually confused with chi field and aura. chi filed is white, aura with colors. I usually easily see the aura on my hands. changing color from pink to light blue.

There's this easy method of doing it with a friend or yourself.
1 Get a pure white backround.
2 See away from the face(or hand) of the person or yourself and look in between the spaces of your hands or around the corners of his/her head. You will see the regular chi field at first like Essa said and after training the colors will appear. Aura seeing is just practice practice practice. I could see my aura COLORS after months and yet I'm better at seeing just regular chi(green or gass-like pixel). My aura is an indigo-like color with green.

Everyone can develop auric site- it's just a matter of fact of training yourself to keep focused and to see the colours better. It will improve as you practice :3

What types of things can you see auras on?

For me , I can see human, animal, or plants etc.

i can only see the transfer of energy from me to the object

nowforever13 wrote:

i can only see the transfer of energy from me to the object

If you're talking about telekinesis(which you are) I see the energy most of the time. I don't transfer much energy because I connect to the one of the object. And try to make it's energy a part of me and let it go on itself without forcing it much.

hm i guess i dont see it when i connect i feel it though

This is very similar to the technique i use
i was trying to see the aura of my laptop using this technique, and i ended up interacting with it telekinetically xP

what good is a aura, ? i have been trying to find out why these thing exist. but i have only found more question. as my quest gos on to another phase i find myself look asking about the aura . i believe that for everything there is a reason.

The Aura is the electromagnetic field, an integrated field within which you are contained. The Aura is one of the bodies of the soul, that is manifested as the soul becomes denser. The aura only exists for you as long as you live, it is required for your soul to be contained within this universe. Why do fields or electromagnetism exist is actually also explainable in spiritual terms; it has to do with reality being polarized. In our universe the game to play is called "union of the opposites". The rules are simple, anything created within this universe has a polar opposite, the rule states that polarities have a tendency to interact. Fundamentally the game consists for the soul to move towards a non polarized path, by any means decided.

It starts with white. The rest surrounding dissipates, focus is lost by drawing attention to breathe. Sight isn't what allows you to see. Exposing comes from belief. Pupils have color. Trying not to look is looking.

Is it possible to see an aura on someone on a photo or video?

Yeah it is, I can see them almost all the time, even in photos.

You could try this when you wish. You don't need to. But it's worth a shot depending on who you are. This technique wormed the best for me.

IndigoTeen98 how do you interpret the colors and shapes that fill your eyesight as you focus deeply?
it seems like the guy in the video has never experienced such a phenomenon (he didn't address it and it seems quite important to this matters)... in my experience these ever changing motions and colors shift with your attention and emotional content and attitude (such as expected from the auric field as he himself describes), and in a quite real way these fields can be directed, expanded and contracted, and affect objects and other living beings in physical and psychological ways (probably also spiritually).
I'm arguing about this, because it seems like this guy is trying to "demystify" or "debunk"; while the technique he offers is truly useful, i don't see how he could declare such an activity as actually seeing to be "false", and then go and spread the idea that it indeed is true what he means... i'm quite certain about the truth of my words because i do this regularly, so i was wondering what to make of his statements. Is he to be trusted? why?
I agree that auras are sensed in many manners, but i cannot accept such an accusation of "falsehood" to a reality of seeing. It is not clear to me why this is visible in terms of science, but is this important at all? (that it needs science to back it up?) Is science backing up TK? i don't see it happening, but i can still apply it, so why? haha i'm so confused because this guy seems to have good intentions and he gives the impression to have an honest attitude, but if he himself knows not, if he masters not the technique, how can he even speak of it, just like that?